Jean Delvare wrote: >>let me try again. >>They already have 2.4 support, right? > > > Ja ja ;) > > >>In that case, for every sysfs entry that is "non-standard" >>(i.e. not covered by the conversion routine getsysname() in >>lib/proc.c), add the name of the sysfs entry at the end of the entry >>in lib/chips.c. If the magnitude is non-standard, add it as well. > > > The amazing thing is that all entries *have* standard names: > > alarms > temp_crit1 > temp_crit2 > temp_input1 > temp_input2 > temp_max1 > temp_max2 > temp_min1 > temp_min2 > > So I would have expected everyting to work out of the box - but it > doesn't. Any clue where I should start digging? > > strace? temp_critx is NOT standard, or at least not converted by getsysname(); so if 'sensors' is looking for it as tempx_crit it won't find it.
