> I wrote the xeontemp driver as a one-temperature driver, > since it was confusing to people using the adm1021 driver that they > had to ignore the local temp and look at the remote temp. Did you really write (I mean, cut and paste) a new driver just so that people wouldn't have to add an ignore statement in their config file? This is bad. A comment in both sensors.conf.eg and doc/chips/adm1021 should be sufficent. > Khali, I'll update the docs myself using Philip's info, > to make recommendations. Maybe you could mention that dual-Xeon systems will have a second adm1021-compatible chip at 0x29 or so? -- Jean Delvare http://www.ensicaen.ismra.fr/~delvare/
