It tells us we forgot to add support to 'sensors' so that's one reason to leave it the way it is. Jean Delvare wrote: > > Hi all, > > The sensors program displays all i2c chips it'll find even the ones that > do not have sensors interface. For example, I have a DC10+ capture > board, and sensors will display entries for the adv7176 and the saa7110 > that live on it. This has no interest and sensors would better keep > quiet about them IMHO. > > For this reason, I plan to add a command line switch to ignore unknown > chips. But I'm wondering if displaying them should still be the default, > or if we should hide them by default (thus the switch would show them > again). Since I don't see any interest in showing them, I'd opt for the > second choice, but sometimes you have reasons I ignore. I remember I > once proposed to hide adapters and algorithms by default, without > realizing how valuable it was when it comes to helping users in support > tickets and on the mailing-list. Maybe there's something similar for > unknown chips? Can't think of anything, but maybe one of you will. > > Thanks. > > -- > Jean Delvare > http://www.ensicaen.ismra.fr/~delvare/
