great. I too waited too long to begin playing with 2.6. It was a pain to get everything going but now I'm in pretty good shape. On via686a, sometimes it would register and sometimes it wouldn't. Try rmmoding and modprobing a few times. I think if I rmmodded the whole i2c stack including i2c-core and starting over it would show up. Haven't gotten to the bottom of it yet. Maybe you can. Thanks for fixing sensors segfault. Jean Delvare wrote: > > > How about if I tar up my /sys and send it to you for testing? > > Then you could test on 2.4. > > Thanks for the proposal, but that wouldn't have been a good idea. This > would have left me in my laziness and I would never have installed 2.6. > Now this is done :) > > I have 2.6.0-test11 up and running on my other (non-laptop) computer. > Couldn't get it on my laptop (which is also my main development system), > it's getting too old and I would have had to update half a dozen system > tools and libraries. The other system is much more recent and I could > get 2.6.0-test11 to work on it, almost perfectly. I have sound working, > my DC10+ board also works (although the visual quality is rather poor, > don't know why). I also have a brand new LCD display on that machine, > (which in turn could become my main development system again ;)) and > have a 1280x1024 framebuffer console and X running with reasonable > performance (you don't need too much for a text editor and a shell). And > now I also have sensors working. Eeprom support is missing though, and > for some reason the via686a driver failed to detect my hardware, while > it used to do. I don't really care because the chip is actually not > wired so it returns useless values, but this probably means there's > something waiting for us to fix it in there. > > The eeprom problem isn't really important, I think. We could even > consider disabling detection in sensors-detect for a while, until the > problem is fixed. Since eeprom contents are now returned in a binary > form, I guess it'll be harder to get it to work through libsensors. > Same problem for decode-*.pl scripts I guess. > > Anyway, I will now be able to test and develop on a 2.6 system, so feel > free to request my assistance whenever needed. > > -- > Jean Delvare > http://www.ensicaen.ismra.fr/~delvare/