Jean Delvare wrote:
>>MODULE_0=i2c-i801
>>MODULE_1=lm80
>>MODULE_2=eeprom
>># sensors
>>lm80-i2c-0-2e
>>Adapter: SMBus I801 adapter at 0500
>>Algorithm: Non-I2C SMBus adapter
>>+5V: +6.71 V (min = +6.71 V, max = +6.71 V)
>>VTT: +2.55 V (min = +2.55 V, max = +2.55 V)
>>+3.3V: +4.43 V (min = +4.43 V, max = +4.43 V)
>>+Vcore: +3.76 V (min = +3.76 V, max = +3.76 V) ALARM
>>+12V: +16.10 V (min = +16.10 V, max = +16.10 V)
>>-12V: -16.11 V (min = -16.11 V, max = -16.11 V)
>>-5V: -6.70 V (min = -6.70 V, max = -6.70 V)
>>fan1: 0 RPM (min = 0 RPM, div = 1)
>>fan2: 0 RPM (min = 0 RPM, div = 1)
>>temp: -1.00 ?C (hot:limit = -1?C, hysteresis = -1?C)
>> (os: limit = -1?C, hysteresis = -1?C)
>>alarms: Board temperature input (LM75) ALARM
>
>
> Wild guess: this isn't a LM80. No value here make sense. What you have
> here is obviously another model of sensoring chipset.
>
> Which version of lm_sensors are you using? Please try a recent version
> of sensors-detect (preferably from CVS), it should be able to identify
> the chip correctly.
It is 2.8.1 and the corresponding patch to 2.4.22.
> If not, please send the output of "i2cdump 0 0x2e", we'll take a look
> and try to identify the chip.
# i2cdump 0 0x2e
No size specified (using byte-data access)
WARNING! This program can confuse your I2C bus, cause data loss and
worse!
I will probe file /dev/i2c-0, address 0x2e, mode byte
You have five seconds to reconsider and press CTRL-C!
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 a b c d e f 0123456789abcdef
00: 11 08 02 00 00 03 08 ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ???..??.........
10: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ................
20: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ................
30: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ................
40: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ................
50: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ................
60: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ................
70: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ................
80: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ................
90: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ................
a0: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ................
b0: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ................
c0: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ................
d0: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ................
e0: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ................
f0: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ................
That's very negative isn't it :-)
Nicolai
