Jean Delvare <khali at linux-fr.org> wrote on 19/09/2003 (16:53) : > > > Ah good, because I can fit my data with an exp function (have some > > more > > measurments now). > > > > 13.71*(^(0.029116*@)) > > > > and back should be > > > > ((`@)-(`(13.71)))/0.029116 > > I suspect that (`(@/13.71))/0.029116 will be faster (untested). Probably but it gives rounding errors. Tested in gnumeric. > The (very short) relevant threads are here: > http://archives.andrew.net.au/lm-sensors/msg02813.html > http://archives.andrew.net.au/lm-sensors/msg02850.html > You'll find Gary's address in the first post. Thanks I'll contact him. > Please CC: the list if your discussion is of public interest (and I > believe it will be). Will keep you updated. -- Preben Randhol ------------- http://www.pvv.org/~randhol/vim -- "Vim : simply the best text editor out there."