On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 06:29:58PM +0200, Jean Delvare wrote: > > It gets whackier. I get the same results from both 2.4 and 2.6 now and > > they're different to before! Joy. > > This simply proves that the problem is much more complex that you may > have first thought. I'm completely lost myself. Doh! > > rmmoding the modules under either version did not help. The sensors > > data was whacky too. here's one snapshot: > > > > thmc10-i2c-0-4d > > Adapter: SMBus PIIX4 adapter at 2180 > > Algorithm: Non-I2C SMBus adapter > > Board: -101?C (min = +20?C, max = -101?C) > > CPU: -101?C (min = +20?C, max = -101?C)ALARM (LOW,HIGH) > > You were supposed to use adm1021, and now it seems that you are using > thmc10. Could you explain that to us? It just changes when things go whacky... It also reported itself as max something or other. I am definately using adm1021 though. > > > What if you load i2c-piix4 first, and then adm1021? If the slowdowns > > > appear before loading adm1021, then the i2c-piix4 driver is at > > > fault, else either adm1021 or i2c-piix4 is at fault. > > > > I did it in the order above. Slowdowns did not happen till I loaded > > the system. > > What if you don't load any chip driver (thmc10 nor adm1021) and load the > system? >From memory it's fine but I'll doublecheck. > > > I would like you to try with i2c-CVS and lm_sensors-CVS. We made a > > > change to the i2c-piix4 driver recently that could influence your > > > problem. Download instructions are to be found here: > > > http://secure.netroedge.com/~lm78/download.html#cvs > > > > Do you still want me to do this? > > Sure I want. Cool. Will do that next. I'm planning on running sensors once a second and logging the output. Any debugging you'd like done while I'm at it? -- "How can I not love the Americans? They helped me with a flat tire the other day," he said. - http://tinyurl.com/h6fo
