> > I think that's what Greg was advocating... > > I was? Hm, don't remember that, I was trying to fix a real problem > that some users had, which was solved by the link order change. > > But how about removing the static arrays all together. That's what > 2.6 has :) And that's why 2.6 will be used by everyone someday, while 2.4 will be forgotten. That's too much change for 2.4/CVS IMHO. -- Jean Delvare http://www.ensicaen.ismra.fr/~delvare/
