On Sat, Aug 23, 2003 at 04:51:04PM -0400, Mark D. Studebaker wrote: > > > Jean Delvare wrote: > >>>I2C_ALGO_MAX, defined in i2c.h, doesn't seem to be used anywhere. > >>>Same for I2C_DUMMY_MAX. Should we simply remove them? > >> > >>agreed. apparently these aren't registered in a static table like > >>drivers are. > > > > > >Done. > > > > > >>BTW if we want to make things better for the foolish people that want > >>to compile-in every driver we should increase the other xxx_MAX > >>defines. > > > > > >Compiling all sensor chip drivers into the kernel is BAD. Do we want to > >help people doing a BAD thing? > > > > I think that's what Greg was advocating... I was? Hm, don't remember that, I was trying to fix a real problem that some users had, which was solved by the link order change. But how about removing the static arrays all together. That's what 2.6 has :) thanks, greg k-h
