Hi, On Sat, Aug 02, 2003 at 08:22:20PM +0200, Axel Thimm wrote: > On Sat, Aug 02, 2003 at 08:11:07PM +0200, Jean Delvare wrote: > > > Is anyone working on this? If not, I'd be interested (I have > > > been maintaining rpms for kernel and userland parts for > > > i2c/lm_sensors 2.7.0 at atrpms). I managed to merge and build i2c&lm_sensors into the kernel sources for RH 9/8.0/7. The only change to i2c&lm_sensors I had to make were prepatches to get the code base patchable for some parts that changed up to the 2.4.21 release. So no real patches for i2c/lm_sensors in the kernel space. :) I have now turned to the userspace. In order to build the lm_sensors userland I need to compile against the kernel headers including the patched in i2c headers (so I2C_HEADERS and LINUX_HEADERS point to the same dir). Since I am building against kernel headers, does that mean that the resulting tools are only applicable to that kernel? Or are they to any kernel that has i2c/lm_sensors 2.8.0 patched in? I wonder if I need LINUX_HEADERS at all, since I am not building external modules, and whether I should simply "carry" the i2c tarball with the lm_sensors source package and build against the i2c headers in that tarball (in order to build independently of the running kernel or installed kernel sources). Does that make sense? -- Axel.Thimm at physik.fu-berlin.de -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.lm-sensors.org/pipermail/lm-sensors/attachments/20030805/8bb0bc44/attachment.bin
