On Sat, Aug 02, 2003 at 08:11:07PM +0200, Jean Delvare wrote: > > > Is anyone working on this? If not, I'd be interested (I have been > > maintaining rpms for kernel and userland parts for i2c/lm_sensors > > 2.7.0 at atrpms). > > We don't build packages anymore, we leave the job to the distribution > maitainers. OK. RH probably will most probably stay with 2.6.5 even with the next release (at least current beta says so). So I will try my luck. > > I am already trying to patch the i2c core and surrounding patches into > > the latest RH errata kernel (based on 2.4.21-pre3). I might have a > > question or two, and could use testers, since I am doing it upon > > request, and the machines I currently have available aren't that > > sensor friendly (one is a Thinkpad ...). > > Questions are welcome and will be answered the best we can. > > BTW: We would like packagers to report fixes they add to their packages. > I have seen many i2c and lm_sensors packages for various distributions > (Red Hat and Gentoo come to mind) including bugfixes to our code and not > letting us know about it. If you want us to fix the bugs, you have to > report, we just can track all packages all the time to see if some bugs > have been locally found and fixed. I always report any fixes upstream, I hope Red Hat does, too. -- Axel.Thimm at physik.fu-berlin.de -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.lm-sensors.org/pipermail/lm-sensors/attachments/20030802/e0ef7448/attachment.bin
