Jean Delvare wrote: >>- You could have done one /proc callback function rather than 4 > > > Hm, how do I know who's calling me then? Using ctl_name and the > LM83_SYSCTL_* constants defined earlier? I don't exactly see the > interest yet. Though the functions are similar, most of the code really > depend on the sensor, so I don't think we'll win in clarity nor code > size. But maybe it's just me. Where could I look at a similar situation > in our code? > See w83781d_pwm() in w83781d.c which uses subtraction to convert the SYSCTL number to PWM number, and the W83781D_REG_PWM macro which indexes into a static array of register numbers.
