agreed - that's why we have a separate column in the new drivers page for whether the chip is detected. you can put 'CVS' or a release number in that column too. Jean Delvare wrote: > I've been adding support to sensor-detect for some chips we don't have a > driver for yet (LM82, LM86, LM90) and I plan to add some more in the > next few days. I think it's generally a good idea to detect many chips > even if we don't have drivers for them - and even if we know we won't > ever write one for some reason. In the first case, this let us know when > a given driver should be written through user repports. In the second > case, it may prevent misdetection of the chip as one we support. >
