Agreed, I think the last thing is fixing the perl problem in sensors-detect. Let's not check in anything else except for that fix and documentation updates. I did take one pass through the docs but everybody else please look at and fix/improve more as you see fit. Jean Delvare wrote: >>patch doesn't compile, no SYSCTL_IN5-7 definitions, >>please retest before you send us something, we're about to release... > > > As we speak about this, what is left to be done before we can release? > Refreshing our checklist could be great: > > - sensors-detect "UTF" issue > Almost fixed, an incompatibility with perl 5.5 remains but should be > solved soon. > > - libsensors numbering because of binary incompatibility..... go to > 1.5.0 or 2.0.0? > Done. > > - Delete sensors.h in sensors/include, move files? > I think I remember it's done? > > - Incompatibility w/ 2.4 kernel i2c structs > Left to me it seems ;) Does it really need to be done *before* the > release? It will anyway take time before the patch is accepted and > kernel 2.4.22 is released (although the .22 cycle should be faster than > .21). > > - Need testing against kernel 2.4.9 > MMH tested and it works, right? Mark, or did you only checked that > mkpatch was working, without actually testing? > > - Mkpatch - abandon, fix, what? > MDS fixed them, right? > > - Update README, INSTALL, etc. > Done by MDS too IIRC. > > - Fix GCC 3 compilation warnings. > Fixed, and all other warnings too. > > I'll retest everything on my four or five systems right before we > release anyway. > > Comments welcome. >
