OK. Try this patch. It compiles on a 2.4.20 kernel. If it doesn't make 2.8.0 that's fine... :v) Philip Pokorny wrote: > Doh... Found it. > > I did the original coding against 2.7.0 and then ported to cvs. Didn't > notice that I needed to move the #defines from sensors.h to lm85.c. > > Sorry... > > Unfortunately, my current development system has a 2.4.7 kernel and > won't compile without tweaks, so I can't verify the new patch compiles > just yet. I'll make sure CVS lk2-4 compiles before I re-submit. > > :v) > > Mark D. Studebaker wrote: > >> patch doesn't compile, no SYSCTL_IN5-7 definitions, >> please retest before you send us something, we're about to release... >> >> Philip Pokorny wrote: >> >>> I had previously put some EMC6D100 support into the LM85 driver. >>> >>> This patch adds support for the additional 3 voltage inputs on the >>> EMC6D100. I also took a closer look at the docs and it doesn't look >>> like we can tell a EMC6D100 from a ...101 so I've removed the 101 >>> "kind". I also avoided problems with the doc generator... >>> >>> Please apply before 2.8.0... >>> >>> :v) >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> >> > > -------------- next part -------------- An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: lm_sensors-cvs-emc6d100-2.patch Url: http://lists.lm-sensors.org/pipermail/lm-sensors/attachments/20030705/c3a0bf84/attachment.pl
