don't worry about it, doc/Makefile isn't called from the top-level Makefile, it has to be run manually. There's no reason for the user to run make in doc/ because we rerun texi and check in all 3 files after any change. Jean Delvare wrote: > > > Update of /home/cvs/lm_sensors2/doc > > In directory mordac.netroedge.com:/tmp/cvs-serv5300 > > > > Modified Files: > > version.texi > > Log Message: > > (Khali) Removed revision, set version to 2.9. > > Due to the order in which I commited the changes, I expect the rule to > build the HTML FAQ to be used on a freshly checked out snapshot (and > thus for the end users of the 2.8.0 release). I see three possibilities > to prevent that. > > 1* Keep an eye on timestamps and change them as needed. I don't know how > to do that on the other CVS end. Do I need to force a commit? > > 2* Edit the rules so that the FAQ files are build if and only if they do > not exist, regardless of timestamps. The better for the user, but can > eventually be a burden for us developpers. > > 3* Ask make to ignore failures on these commands (using a leading dash). > This will show some errors which, even if non-fatal, may confuse the > users. > > I'd be in favor of solution #2 but would like to hear any opinion or > other proposal. > > -- > Jean Delvare > http://www.ensicaen.ismra.fr/~delvare/
