> Update of /home/cvs/lm_sensors2/doc > In directory mordac.netroedge.com:/tmp/cvs-serv5300 > > Modified Files: > version.texi > Log Message: > (Khali) Removed revision, set version to 2.9. Due to the order in which I commited the changes, I expect the rule to build the HTML FAQ to be used on a freshly checked out snapshot (and thus for the end users of the 2.8.0 release). I see three possibilities to prevent that. 1* Keep an eye on timestamps and change them as needed. I don't know how to do that on the other CVS end. Do I need to force a commit? 2* Edit the rules so that the FAQ files are build if and only if they do not exist, regardless of timestamps. The better for the user, but can eventually be a burden for us developpers. 3* Ask make to ignore failures on these commands (using a leading dash). This will show some errors which, even if non-fatal, may confuse the users. I'd be in favor of solution #2 but would like to hear any opinion or other proposal. -- Jean Delvare http://www.ensicaen.ismra.fr/~delvare/
