> Some weeks ago, I started converting the FAQ to docbook by hand as an > exercise in learning docbook. I'm sure there are 1001 texi-2-XML > tools, but doing it quickly wasn't the point at the time. You can see > the results here: > > http://members.dca.net/mhoffman/sensors/docbook/ > > The HTML is there, along with a tarball of what I used to get there. > There is also a list of RedHat 9 RPMS that I installed. I've learned > as much about docbook as I intended without ever finishing this... but > if you think it's an improvement I'll keep on it. FWIW I think the > source is easier to read than texi. I don't mind if we use texi or docbook, as long as there is one single root document that can be converted to both plain text and HTML. I would tend to think that XML is good (tm) and should be used as often as possible, but since Crazy Pete did it as texi at a time none of us was interested in doing anything, I'd keep it this way until we have a strong reason for switching to any other system. -- Jean Delvare http://www.ensicaen.ismra.fr/~delvare/
