If you think it looks better then go ahead and check it in. See instructions in doc/Makefile. The version is totally arbitrary. If you want to advance it to 2.8 go ahead. Jean Delvare wrote: > > I think that we should regenerate the HTML (and possibly text) version > of our FAQ using a newer texinfo. I gave it a try and the HTML code > seems to have been greatly improved. > > And, by the way, why is the faq version set to 2.0? It should be either > 2.7.0 (or 2.8.0 by now) if it is supposed to match the lm_sensors > release number (I don't think it is) or 2.9 if it has its own numbering > scheme. > > Pete, what are we supposed to fill in the EDITION and VERSION fields of > version.texi? (I mean, what's the difference between these fields?) > Also, don't you want your name to be mentioned in the file? You did a > great job! > > -- > Jean Delvare > http://www.ensicaen.ismra.fr/~delvare/
