> This would make sense. David, correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe > that you can actually write to the files (simply using "cat 1 2 > > /proc/sys/dev/sensors/via686a-isa-6000/in1" for example). So, if > "sensors -s" fails, this must be because of libsensors *thinking* it > cannot write. Actually no. Not using cat. I get this error if do that: bash-2.05b# cat 1 2 > /proc/sys/dev/sensors/via686a-isa-6000/in1 cat: 1: No such file or directory cat: 2: No such file or directory I can though 'echo' to it: Previous message: On Wednesday 25 June 2003 08:52 am, you wrote: > > I don't have my lm_sensors source handy right now, but I wanted to > > reply so perhaps you or someone else could look into this... > > > > I notice that the adapter is registered at address 6000. That's a bit > > of a strange isa address. I believe that the original ISA bus only > > has I/O addresses up to 3fff. Anything above that is either an alias > > or a PCI bus address. > > > > Perhaps there is a test in the ISA write function that makes sure the > > address you're attempting to write is in the range: 0-3fff or less and > > if not, returns an error. > > This would make sense. David, correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe > that you can actually write to the files (simply using "cat 1 2 > > /proc/sys/dev/sensors/via686a-isa-6000/in1" for example). So, if > "sensors -s" fails, this must be because of libsensors *thinking* it > cannot write. > > David, maybe we already asked you and I'm sorry for that, but I can't > remember (it's been so long): > > 1* Are you using i2c & lm_sensors 2.7.0 or CVS? > > 2* Are you using the mkpatch method or the traditional separated > compilation tree method? > > Thanks.
