Yes that was me, next time I will add my name to the comments. We need only one, I just wanted you to confirm it's OK to replace pwmtest, the only changes to pwmtest's functionality are: 5 seconds delay, replacing the 3 seconds let the user decide whether a fan responds to changes of PWM value appended fancontrol configuration dialog (can be skipped) Marius On Sat, 21 Jun 2003 11:26:55 -0400 "Mark D. Studebaker " <mds at paradyne.com> wrote: > That was you that checked the scripts in? (please put your name in the checkin comments) > Do we need both pwmtest and pwmconfig or should we get rid of one? > > > Marius Reiner wrote: > > ok, i'm working on it. > > Could you please add me to the mailing list? > > Regards > > Marius > > > > On Mon, 16 Jun 2003 21:55:53 -0400 "Mark D. Studebaker " <mds at paradyne.com> wrote: > > > >>thanks. > >>Please see our new script prog/pwm/pwmtest in CVS. > >>Perhaps the output of that script could be used or modified to provide arguments to a modified version of your script? > >>Then put them together and we have a system.... > >> > >>Marius Reiner wrote: > >> > >>>Hi > >>>i wrote a bash script for temperature dependent fan control. I couldn't find something similar on your site, so maybe you are interested. > >>>Right now it's a horror to read, but it works, and before I clean it up, it would be nice to know if someone else wants to use it too. > >>>It's GPLed, so don't hesitate using it to code a better script/fan-daemon :) > >>>Best regards, > >>>Marius > >> > > > > >
