On Sun, Jun 01, 2003 at 10:27:06PM -0700, Philip Pokorny wrote: > So '- km' in the sensors.h comments must be Kyosti... > > There has got to be some common header files between kernel and user space > so that data structures and "magic" constants are shared. No, two separate header files, both kept in sync. That's the way to do this today. > If user space can't include kernel headers, then the kernel will have to > include a "user space" header. Nope, see the many threads on the linux-kernel mailing list about this issue. > It would seem to me that the alternative of having two copies of the same > data structures and constants would be worse. Nope. > When did this become such a big issue? Always has been :) > Absolutely, either put the old code back or create another file with the > common code that can be included one place or the other... So does this mean that the drivers/i2c/* files in the 2.4 tree are out of date with the cvs versions? If so, I have some changes that are now in 2.4 that need to be put into the cvs tree... Also, any reason not to update the in-tree 2.4 kernel versions? thanks, greg k-h
