[CVS PATCH] Sync cvs tree with latest 2.5 bk tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Apr 28, 2003 at 07:15:33PM -0400, Mark M. Hoffman wrote:
> * Greg KH <greg at kroah.com> [2003-04-28 09:58:26 -0700]:
> > Why even worry about a 2.5 and onward version of the CVS tree?  Why not
> > just use CVS for 2.4 and older, and use the in-kernel tree version of
> > the sensors and i2c code for that stuff?
> 
> Won't we still need to branch lmsensors for userspace?

Yes, lmsensors will need to.  But not the kernel code.  Sorry, I was
thinking only the kernel code when I wrote that.

greg k-h



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Hardware Monitoring]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]

  Powered by Linux