thanks. Since we haven't yet branched lmsensors, we have some things to decide before I apply this patch. Namely, do we do another 2.4-compatible release. I'm in favor of at least one more, because I would like to clear up some problems in 2.7.0. The problems are really on the i2c side though. I just studied up on CVS merging. It appears that you can only merge from the branch to the trunk? In i2c, 2.4 is the branch and 2.5 is the trunk. I want to get some changes from the trunk (for example new ID's in i2c-id.h) over to the 2.4 branch before we do a release from the 2.4 branch. Let's decide what we want to do. I just went through 36 tickets covering almost 4 weeks. Phil? Mark H? others? comments please mds Greg KH wrote: > Hi all, > > Here's a patch to sync up the lmsensors cvs tree with the current 2.5 bk > tree. Anyone with commit permissions want to submit it? > > The header files should be renamed too, as they have been in the kernel > tree, but a cvs diff can't show that :) > > I'll submit a i2c sync patch, after this is applied, as that is out of > date quite a bit too. > > Ah, now you all see why it's tough to do work in two trees... > > thanks, > > greg k-h > >
