On 64-bit, I have an Intel 64-bit system, haven't recompiled in a while, but it works, last time I was really working on it I don't think I fixed all the compiler warnings. I can look at it again if it's timely. On the lm85 patch, I can check it into CVS if it isn't in there already (can't remember where we left it - will have to check) On a release, let's call it 2.8.0 (since we removed all pre-kernel-2.4.9 compatibility) and let's release in 2-3 weeks. We'll release from the lm_sensors tree and from the lk2-4 branch of the i2c tree. I think any "reverse merges" from the trunk to the lk2-4 branch in i2c will have to be manual. But it shouldn't be very much. Mainly the new ID's in i2c-id.h. sound like a plan? mds Greg KH wrote: > > On Sat, Apr 26, 2003 at 10:47:06PM -0700, Philip Pokorny wrote: > > I'd personally like to see my lm85 patch make it into 2.7.x... > > Have a reference to it? If it works with 2.5 right now, I'd be glad to > add it. > > > Also, I've recently compiled i2c on a 64-bit Opteron and there are several > > type conversion issues that are not 64-bit clean. I looked into it a > > little bit and the conversions seemed wrong even in a 32-bit environment > > (ints to void *) > > Hm, not good. I'll gladly take patches to fix this problem. I think I > even have access to a amd64 box around here somewhere that I could test > them out on. > > > If you haven't already encountered these problems, then I'll work up a > > patch and post it. > > Patches are always welcome :) > > thanks, > > greg k-h
