thanks for the note, and thanks for chipping in on email. Please continue to contribute your opinions on the kernel issues. mds Jean Delvare wrote: > I'd like to let all you know I'm not dead, nor have I let you down. I > have been away for about ten days, and am now reading the 150 mails > posted to the list while I was gone. Quite a long process. I've been > answering a few ones that had been left unanswered. It seems that things > are moving on heavily these days, and though I'm not really qualified, > I'll help if possible. I am at least reading you with great attention, > and I'll express myself sometimes if I think it has an interest. > > Also, I'm not working a lot on lm_sensors these days for two reasons. > First, it seems there's a lot of activity, way beyond my abilities, and > I don't want to break anything. Second, I'm working on the DMI issue. > I've been rewritting dmidecode, it now has a public CVS (see > http://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/dmidecode). This being done, I'm now > working on the DMI code found inside the Linux kernel. I want to have > the dmi info exported to /proc, as well as accessible from other parts > of the kernel (this would avoid having this part of the code duplicated > three or four times across the kernel sources). This isn't an easy job > for me since I'm not used to kernel programming, but this is really > interesting and I should have something working soon. > > Once I'll have it working and if it finally makes it into the kernel, > I'll make the necessary changes to lm_sensors. > > I'm still there if you need me. >
