> go for it I am in the process of updating useful_addresses.html, and am using http://secure.netroedge.com/~lm78/supported.html as a reference. This page mentions a MAX1676A chipset, which we are pretending to support. Unfortunately, there's no trace of this chipset's in our source code nor on Maxim IC's website. So, I would tend to think that this is a typo and that it should be MAX1617A instead. Am I right? Also, I couldn't find any DS1625 chipset on Dallas Semiconductor website (which is the same as Maxim IC's one, I guess they have joined somehow). But this time, there is a lot of references to it in our source code. Who's wrong? Any clue welcome. Updating useful_addresses.html is a long and slow process, so please be patient. -- Jean Delvare http://www.ensicaen.ismra.fr/~delvare/
