2.7.0 testings

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Khali, you fixed the makefiles and I fixed the request_regions.
I think we're only awaiting your compile test for 2.2
and then we're ready for release??

"Mark D. Studebaker" wrote:
> 
> I like your suggestion for fixing LINUX :=
> If you fix that I'll fix pport.
> 
> The build symlink comes from the top level kernel Makefile,
> from 'make modules_install'.
> 
> Jean Delvare wrote:
> >
> > > I'll test with a 2.2 series kernel on another machine early tomorrow.
> >
> > We have a problem. 2.2 kernels may not have a
> > /lib/modules/$VERSION/build symlink. I don't know what's responsible for
> > creating it. Curiously, when I tried on my laptop with a 2.2.22 kernel,
> > the symlink was created. But on my old desktop system, kernels 2.2.14,
> > 2.2.16 and 2.2.20 don't have one.
> >
> > So we can't keep the things as they are. I suggest to use the following:
> >
> > LINUX := $(shell if [ -L /lib/modules/$(KERNELVERSION)/build ] ; then
> > echo "/lib/modules/$(KERNELVERSION)/build" ; else echo "/usr/src/linux"
> > ; fi)
> >
> > Someone's got a better idea?
> >
> > Another problem:
> >
> > /usr/src/i2c> make
> > gcc -I/usr/src/linux/include -O2 -DLM_SENSORS -D__KERNEL__ -DMODULE
> > -fomit-frame-pointer -DEXPORT_SYMTAB -DMODVERSIONS -include
> > /usr/src/linux/include/linux/modversions.h -c kernel/i2c-pport.c -o
> > kernel/i2c-pport.o
> > kernel/i2c-pport.c: In function `bit_pport_init':
> > kernel/i2c-pport.c:115: wrong type argument to unary exclamation mark
> > make: *** [kernel/i2c-pport.o] Error 1
> > /usr/src/i2c>
> >
> > This is a 2.2.20 kernel. The code is:
> >
> >     112
> >     113 static int bit_pport_init(void)
> >     114 {
> >     115     if (!request_region((base+2),1, "i2c (PPORT adapter)")) {
> >     116         return -ENODEV;
> >     117     } else {
> >     118
> >
> > >From /usr/src/linux-2.2.20:
> > kernel/resource.c:void request_region(unsigned long from, unsigned long
> > num, const char *name)
> > So actually you are not supposed to check a returned value. Who can fix
> > this?
> >
> > I also get this warning for many files:
> > /usr/src/linux-2.2.20/include/linux/module.h:13: warning: `_set_ver'
> > redefined
> > /usr/src/linux-2.2.20/include/linux/modsetver.h:9: warning: this is the
> > location of the previous definition
> > But I guess this is a kernel-side problem, right? Gonna try on a 2.2.22
> > to see if it has been fixed.
> >
> > --
> > Jean Delvare
> > http://www.ensicaen.ismra.fr/~delvare/



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Hardware Monitoring]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]

  Powered by Linux