committed. thanks Tom Rini wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 02:04:21PM -0500, Mark D. Studebaker wrote: > > > whatever your patch was against didn't match our tree very well. would > > you please > > resolve the differences and generate a new patch against our tree? > > thanks > > Here's a patch vs current i2c CVS (HEAD, if that makes a difference), > which brings things back into line. > > Let me know when you commit this, and I'll bring the linuxppc BK trees > back into line. >
