whatever your patch was against didn't match our tree very well. would you please resolve the differences and generate a new patch against our tree? thanks mds Tom Rini wrote: > > On Sun, Nov 17, 2002 at 10:44:40PM +0100, Joakim Tjernlund wrote: > > > > Tom + Joakim, > > > we're doing a release soon over here at sensors/i2c, > > > do you want this checked in as-is, with mods, or not at all? > > > > As-is for me. No problems reported to me. > > Works for me then. > > -- > Tom Rini (TR1265) > http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/ -------------- next part -------------- patching file i2c-algo-8xx.c Hunk #1 FAILED at 7. Hunk #2 FAILED at 27. Hunk #3 succeeded at 74 with fuzz 2 (offset 14 lines). Hunk #5 succeeded at 157 (offset 18 lines). Hunk #6 FAILED at 177. Hunk #8 succeeded at 220 (offset 18 lines). Hunk #9 FAILED at 237. Hunk #10 succeeded at 333 (offset 2 lines). Hunk #11 FAILED at 343. Hunk #12 FAILED at 359. Hunk #13 succeeded at 439 (offset 18 lines). Hunk #14 FAILED at 464. Hunk #15 succeeded at 514 (offset 2 lines). 7 out of 15 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file i2c-algo-8xx.c.rej
