405 i2c patch

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Phil,
For this 405 patch, is it possible for you to do renames in CVS and save
the history? Is it worth it?
Or should I just remove the old and add the new?


BTW the // comments were in the old 405 files so I guess I won't
reject the patch for that.


frodol at dds.nl wrote:
> 
> phil at netroedge.com wrote:
> >
> >
> > A while ago we converted any // comments to the /* */ kind.  I think
> > Frodo had some good reasons for doing this, although I don't remember
> > right now what they were.  Perhaps it is for compiler compatibility?
> > I guess if for nothing else, it would be nice to convert those for
> > consistency sake.
> 
> // is not ISO-C. GCC accepts it, though, but some versions emit warnings,
> depending on compiler flags.
>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Hardware Monitoring]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]

  Powered by Linux