actually kernel 2.4.13 includes a big i2c update, the first since January. "J . A . Magallon" wrote: > > On 20011031 Mark D. Studebaker wrote: > >Now I'm wondering if we changed things in the wrong direction. > >Rather than going from "old" to "new" should we have gone > >from "new" to "old". > > > >Since the kernel has "old" CONFIG_xxx things, > >won't us changing things lead to problems with compiles outside > >of the kernel (which check for definitions of CONFIG_xxx) > >and also unnecessary patches? > > > >Seems like it would be safer to go back to the "old" and > >make sure the few places that used "new" were switched to "old". > > > >what do you all think? > > > > I have seen that cvs code for i2c has not changed since time ago. > What about submitting an update to Linus/Alan with the remaining changes > (version info..) and the new config names ? Even you can call it > 2.6.2. > > -- > J.A. Magallon # Let the source be with you... > mailto:jamagallon at able.es > Mandrake Linux release 8.2 (Cooker) for i586 > Linux werewolf 2.4.13-ac5-beo #1 SMP Tue Oct 30 00:10:00 CET 2001 i686
