On 20011031 Mark D. Studebaker wrote: >Now I'm wondering if we changed things in the wrong direction. >Rather than going from "old" to "new" should we have gone >from "new" to "old". > >Since the kernel has "old" CONFIG_xxx things, >won't us changing things lead to problems with compiles outside >of the kernel (which check for definitions of CONFIG_xxx) >and also unnecessary patches? > >Seems like it would be safer to go back to the "old" and >make sure the few places that used "new" were switched to "old". > >what do you all think? > I have seen that cvs code for i2c has not changed since time ago. What about submitting an update to Linus/Alan with the remaining changes (version info..) and the new config names ? Even you can call it 2.6.2. -- J.A. Magallon # Let the source be with you... mailto:jamagallon at able.es Mandrake Linux release 8.2 (Cooker) for i586 Linux werewolf 2.4.13-ac5-beo #1 SMP Tue Oct 30 00:10:00 CET 2001 i686
