Re: [PATCH] selftest/livepatch: Only run test-kprobe with CONFIG_KPROBES_ON_FTRACE

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Mar 18, 2025 at 11:14:55AM +0100, Miroslav Benes wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Mon, 17 Mar 2025, Song Liu wrote:
> 
> > On Mon, Mar 17, 2025 at 11:59 AM Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > On 3/17/25 12:51, Song Liu wrote:
> > > > CONFIG_KPROBES_ON_FTRACE is required for test-kprobe. Skip test-kprobe
> > > > when CONFIG_KPROBES_ON_FTRACE is not set.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Song Liu <song@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > ---
> > > >  tools/testing/selftests/livepatch/test-kprobe.sh | 2 ++
> > > >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/livepatch/test-kprobe.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/livepatch/test-kprobe.sh
> > > > index 115065156016..fd823dd5dd7f 100755
> > > > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/livepatch/test-kprobe.sh
> > > > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/livepatch/test-kprobe.sh
> > > > @@ -5,6 +5,8 @@
> > > >
> > > >  . $(dirname $0)/functions.sh
> > > >
> > > > +zgrep KPROBES_ON_FTRACE /proc/config.gz || skip "test-kprobe requires CONFIG_KPROBES_ON_FTRACE"
> > > > +
> > >
> > > Hi Song,
> > >
> > > This in turn depends on CONFIG_IKCONFIG_PROC for /proc/config.gz (not
> > > set for RHEL distro kernels).
> > 
> > I was actually worrying about this when testing it.
> > 
> > > Is there a dynamic way to figure out CONFIG_KPROBES_ON_FTRACE support?
> > 
> > How about we grep kprobe_ftrace_ops from /proc/kallsyms?
> 
> which relies on having KALLSYMS_ALL enabled but since CONFIG_LIVEPATCH 
> depends on it, we are good. So I would say yes, it is a better option. 
> Please, add a comment around.
> 

Kallsyms is a good workaround as kprobe_ftrace_ops should be stable (I
hope :)

Since Song probably noticed this when upgrading and the new kprobes test
unexpectedly failed, I'd add a Fixes tag to help out backporters:

  Fixes: 62597edf6340 ("selftests: livepatch: test livepatching a kprobed function")

but IMHO not worth rushing as important through the merge window.


Also, while poking at this today with virtme-ng, my initial attempt had
build a fairly minimal kernel without CONFIG_DYNAMIC_DEBUG.  We can also
check for that via the sysfs interface to avoid confusing path-not-found
msgs, like the following ...

-- Joe

-->8-- -->8-- -->8-- -->8-- -->8-- -->8-- -->8-- -->8-- -->8-- -->8--


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux