Re: [PATCH] selftest/livepatch: Only run test-kprobe with CONFIG_KPROBES_ON_FTRACE

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Mar 17, 2025 at 11:59 AM Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 3/17/25 12:51, Song Liu wrote:
> > CONFIG_KPROBES_ON_FTRACE is required for test-kprobe. Skip test-kprobe
> > when CONFIG_KPROBES_ON_FTRACE is not set.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Song Liu <song@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  tools/testing/selftests/livepatch/test-kprobe.sh | 2 ++
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/livepatch/test-kprobe.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/livepatch/test-kprobe.sh
> > index 115065156016..fd823dd5dd7f 100755
> > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/livepatch/test-kprobe.sh
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/livepatch/test-kprobe.sh
> > @@ -5,6 +5,8 @@
> >
> >  . $(dirname $0)/functions.sh
> >
> > +zgrep KPROBES_ON_FTRACE /proc/config.gz || skip "test-kprobe requires CONFIG_KPROBES_ON_FTRACE"
> > +
>
> Hi Song,
>
> This in turn depends on CONFIG_IKCONFIG_PROC for /proc/config.gz (not
> set for RHEL distro kernels).

I was actually worrying about this when testing it.

> Is there a dynamic way to figure out CONFIG_KPROBES_ON_FTRACE support?

How about we grep kprobe_ftrace_ops from /proc/kallsyms?

Thanks,
Song

> Without looking into it very long, maybe test_klp_kprobe.c's call to
> register_kprobe() could fail with -ENOTSUPP and the test script could
> gracefully skip the test?
>
> Regards,
>
> --
> Joe
>





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux