> On Oct 3, 2024, at 23:25, Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 03, 2024 at 10:59:11PM +0800, zhang warden wrote: >>> This attribute specifies the sequence in which live patch modules >>> are applied to the system. If multiple live patches modify the same >>> function, the implementation with the highest stack order is used, >>> unless a transition is currently in progress. >> >> This description looks good to me. What's the suggestion of >> other maintainers ? > > I like it, though "highest stack order" is still a bit arbitrary, since > the highest stack order is actually the lowest number. > > -- > Josh How about: This attribute specifies the sequence in which live patch module are applied to the system. If multiple live patches modify the same function, the implementation with the biggest 'stack_order' number is used, unless a transition is currently in progress. Regards. Wardenjohn.
