Hi, Petr.
> Also please rebase the patch on top of current Linus' master or
> v6.11. There are conflicts with the commit adb68ed26a3e922
> ("livepatch: Add "replace" sysfs attribute").
>
OK, will fix it.
>>>> +Contact: live-patching@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> +Description:
>>>> + This attribute holds the stack order of a livepatch module applied
>>>> + to the running system.
>>>
>>> It's probably a good idea to clarify what "stack order" means. Also,
>>> try to keep the text under 80 columns for consistency.
>>>
>>> How about:
>>>
>>> This attribute indicates the order the patch was applied
>>> compared to other patches. For example, a stack_order value of
>>> '2' indicates the patch was applied after the patch with stack
>>> order '1' and before any other currently applied patches.
>>>
>>
>> Or how about:
>>
>> This attribute indicates the order of the livepatch module
>> applied to the system. The stack_order value N means
>> that this module is the Nth applied to the system. If there
>> are serval patches changing the same function, the function
>> version of the biggest stack_order is enabling in the system.
>
> The 2nd sentence looks superfluous. The 3rd sentence explains
> the important effect.
>
> Well, the part "is enabling in the system" is a bit cryptic.
> I would write something like:
>
> This attribute specifies the sequence in which live patch modules
> are applied to the system. If multiple live patches modify the same
> function, the implementation with the highest stack order is used,
> unless a transition is currently in progress.
This description looks good to me. What's the suggestion of
other maintainers ?
Regards.
Wardenjohn.
