> On Fri, Apr 14, 2023 at 2:54 PM Jose E. Marchesi > <jose.marchesi@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> As for Rust... we have the Rust GCC support and that would fit in the MC >> as well. We can surely invite some of the hackers working in the >> front-end. But maybe it would be better to have that discussion in a >> Rust MC, if there is gonna be one (Miguel?). > > It is likely we will submit a Rust MC proposal, yeah. > > Last year we had both Rust GCC and rustc_codegen_gcc presenting in the > Rust MC (and Kangrejos too), and I would be grateful to have them > again, but if it is best for everybody otherwise, we can change things > of course. I think it makes sense to discuss these toolchain-related topics in the Rust MC. Infrastructure tends to be traversal :) > (Is it already known how tight timing will be this year for MCs?) > >> For starters, I would make sure that the involved MCs (Live Patching, >> Toolchains, and an eventual Rust MC) do not overlap in the schedule. >> Then we could have these discussions in either microconferences. > > Yeah, it sounds good to me. > > Cheers, > Miguel