+++ Jiri Kosina [26/10/16 10:17 +0200]:
On Wed, 26 Oct 2016, Rusty Russell wrote:
>> Hm, quick question, which tree would this patch go to? Though the
>> cleanup is for modules, there is an indirect cross-tree dependency
>> (taint_flag.module needs to be true for TAINT_LIVEPATCH for Josh's
>> patch to still work as intended). The least complicated thing to do
>> would be to just take this through the livepatch tree (with Rusty's
>> approval :-)), no?
>
> I don't want to be sneaking this behind Rusty's back, but he hasn't
> reposnded so far.
I finally side-stepped this by appointing Jessica maintainer, thus her
Reviewed-by is sufficient for the module tree.
Awesome! :)
Lazy, huh?
Laziness has always been the main power behind all the progress of the
mankind :P
Jessica, do you want me to take the patch through livepatching tree still,
or would you route it yourself now?
Hi Jiri,
Once I'm done fumbling with maintainership logistics, I will take this
patch through my tree. :-)
Thanks,
Jessica
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe live-patching" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
