On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 02:09:43PM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > > > I think you're supposed to have initialized reservation.entry already. > > > > What do you mean with that? > > I think the reservation was declared to be initialized as zeroes, but > there was never an INIT_LIST_HEAD(&reservation.entry) to set the > pointers to each other? Only the head of the list needs a INIT_LIST_HEAD, the entries which just happen to use the list_head structure don't need any initialization out of the list_add/list_add_tail call.
