On Fri, Jan 10, 2025 at 12:51:15PM -0500, Brian Foster wrote: > This might be a little more clear after the (non-squashed) fbatch > patches which move where pos is sampled (to handle that it can change at > that point) and drop some of the pos function params, but if we still > want to clean that up at the end I'd rather do it as a standalone patch > at that point. Yeah, that sounds reasonable.
