On Mon, Oct 14, 2024 at 08:07:25AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Mon, Oct 14, 2024 at 01:49:36AM +0800, Zorro Lang wrote: > > Thanks for reworking this patch, it's been merged into fstests, named > > xfs/629~632. But now these 4 cases always fail on upstream xfs, e.g > > (diff output) [1][2][3][4]. Could you help to take a look at the > > failure which Darick metioned above too :) > > What do you mean with upstream xfs? Any kernel before the eofblocks > fixes will obviously fail. Always_cow will also always fail and I'll > send a patch for that. Any other configuration you've seen? fsdax, any config with an extent size hint set, and any time sb_rextsize > 1 fsblock. --D