Re: RFC: don't fail tests when mkfs options collide

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jul 26, 2024 at 07:11:45PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 26, 2024 at 09:20:14AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > The big question I have is: for at least the standard -g all runs, does
> > this decrease the number of tests selected?
> 
> For a -g auto / -g quick run without any extra options it does not
> change test coverage at all.  It only kicks in if you add "problematic"
> mkfs options.

<nod> In that case, I think I'm ok with letting this graduate to
for-next to see what happens :)

Acked-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@xxxxxxxxxx>

--D




[Index of Archives]     [XFS Filesystem Development (older mail)]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux