On Wed, Jun 19, 2024 at 01:53:52PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Move the relock path out of the straight line and add a comment
> explaining why it exists.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
Looks good,
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@xxxxxxxxxx>
--D
> ---
> fs/xfs/xfs_file.c | 18 +++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c
> index b240ea5241dc9d..74c2c8d253e69b 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c
> @@ -213,14 +213,18 @@ xfs_ilock_iocb_for_write(
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> - if (*lock_mode == XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL)
> - return 0;
> - if (!xfs_iflags_test(ip, XFS_IREMAPPING))
> - return 0;
> + /*
> + * If a reflink remap is in progress we always need to take the iolock
> + * exclusively to wait for it to finish.
> + */
> + if (*lock_mode == XFS_IOLOCK_SHARED &&
> + xfs_iflags_test(ip, XFS_IREMAPPING)) {
> + xfs_iunlock(ip, *lock_mode);
> + *lock_mode = XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL;
> + return xfs_ilock_iocb(iocb, *lock_mode);
> + }
>
> - xfs_iunlock(ip, *lock_mode);
> - *lock_mode = XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL;
> - return xfs_ilock_iocb(iocb, *lock_mode);
> + return 0;
> }
>
> static unsigned int
> --
> 2.43.0
>
>
