Re: [PATCH 9/9] mm,page_owner: don't remove GFP flags in add_stack_record_to_list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH 9/9] mm,page_owner: don't remove GFP flags in add_stack_record_to_list
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2024 08:17:21 +0200
Cc: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20240429061529.1550204-10-hch@lst.de>
References: <20240429061529.1550204-1-hch@lst.de> <20240429061529.1550204-10-hch@lst.de>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01)

Please discard one, I developed this on the currently checked out tree,
but it has been sent separately.

References:
- xfs_bmapi_write retval fix v2
  - From: Christoph Hellwig
- [PATCH 9/9] mm,page_owner: don't remove GFP flags in add_stack_record_to_list
  - From: Christoph Hellwig

Prev by Date: [PATCH 9/9] mm,page_owner: don't remove GFP flags in add_stack_record_to_list
Next by Date: [PATCH 1/3] xfs: fix log recovery buffer allocation for the legacy h_size fixup
Previous by thread: [PATCH 9/9] mm,page_owner: don't remove GFP flags in add_stack_record_to_list
Next by thread: fix h_size validation
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [XFS Filesystem Development (older mail)] [Linux Filesystem Development] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite Trails] [Linux Kernel] [Linux RAID] [Linux SCSI]

Powered by Linux