Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] xfs: forced extent alignment

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 06/03/2024 11:46, John Garry wrote:
The following 3 patches:

- rework the setup and extent allocation logic a bit to make force
   aligned allocation much easier to implement and understand
- move all the alignment adjustments into the setup logic
- rework the alignment slop calculations and greatly simplify the
   the exact EOF block allocation case
- add a XFS_ALLOC_FORCEALIGN flag so that the inode config only
   needs to be checked once at setup. This also allows other
   allocation types (e.g. inode clusters) use forced alignment
   allocation semantics in future.
- clearly document when we are turning off allocation alignment and
   abort FORCEALIGN allocation at that point rather than doing
   unaligned allocation.

I've run this through fstests once so it doesn't let the smoke out,
but I haven't actually tested it against a stripe aligned filesystem
config yet, nor tested the forcealign functionality so it may not be
exactly right yet.

Is this sufficiently complete for you to take from here into the
forcealign series?


I'll try it out.

Update:
I replaced your patches with the relevant forcealign patches which I send out in "[PATCH v2 00/14] block atomic writes for XFS".

So far they seem to work fine. An updated branch is here, if you want to check what else I am using:
https://github.com/johnpgarry/linux/commits/atomic-writes-v6.8-v5-fs-v2-dchinner/

I haven't tried any stripe unit testing yet - I'll look at that now.

Thanks,
John





[Index of Archives]     [XFS Filesystem Development (older mail)]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux