Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] xfs: forced extent alignment

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 06/03/2024 05:20, Dave Chinner wrote:
Hi Garry,

I figured that it was simpler just to write the forced extent
alignment allocator patches that to make you struggle through them
and require lots of round trips to understand all the weird corner
cases.

I appreciate that.


The following 3 patches:

- rework the setup and extent allocation logic a bit to make force
   aligned allocation much easier to implement and understand
- move all the alignment adjustments into the setup logic
- rework the alignment slop calculations and greatly simplify the
   the exact EOF block allocation case
- add a XFS_ALLOC_FORCEALIGN flag so that the inode config only
   needs to be checked once at setup. This also allows other
   allocation types (e.g. inode clusters) use forced alignment
   allocation semantics in future.
- clearly document when we are turning off allocation alignment and
   abort FORCEALIGN allocation at that point rather than doing
   unaligned allocation.

I've run this through fstests once so it doesn't let the smoke out,
but I haven't actually tested it against a stripe aligned filesystem
config yet, nor tested the forcealign functionality so it may not be
exactly right yet.

Is this sufficiently complete for you to take from here into the
forcealign series?


I'll try it out.

What baseline are these against? Mine were against v6.8-rc5, but I guess that you develop against an XFS integration tree. Maybe they apply and build cleanly against v6.8-rc5 ...

Cheers,
John





[Index of Archives]     [XFS Filesystem Development (older mail)]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux