Re: [PATCH v3 3/4] build: Request 64-bit time_t where possible

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Dec 15, 2023 at 01:36:42AM +0000, Sam James wrote:
> Suggested by Darrick during LFS review. We take the same approach as in
> 5c0599b721d1d232d2e400f357abdf2736f24a97 ('Fix building xfsprogs on 32-bit platforms')
> to avoid autoconf hell - just take the tried & tested approach which is working
> fine for us with LFS already.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@xxxxxxxxxx>

Looks good to me,
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@xxxxxxxxxx>

--D

> ---
>  include/builddefs.in | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/builddefs.in b/include/builddefs.in
> index 147c9b98..969254f3 100644
> --- a/include/builddefs.in
> +++ b/include/builddefs.in
> @@ -13,8 +13,8 @@ OPTIMIZER = @opt_build@
>  MALLOCLIB = @malloc_lib@
>  LOADERFLAGS = @LDFLAGS@
>  LTLDFLAGS = @LDFLAGS@
> -CFLAGS = @CFLAGS@ -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -Wno-address-of-packed-member
> -BUILD_CFLAGS = @BUILD_CFLAGS@ -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64
> +CFLAGS = @CFLAGS@ -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_TIME_BITS=64 -Wno-address-of-packed-member
> +BUILD_CFLAGS = @BUILD_CFLAGS@ -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_TIME_BITS=64
>  
>  # make sure we don't pick up whacky LDFLAGS from the make environment and
>  # only use what we calculate from the configured options above.
> -- 
> 2.43.0
> 
> 




[Index of Archives]     [XFS Filesystem Development (older mail)]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux