Re: [PATCH 5/9] xfs: zap broken inode forks

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/9] xfs: zap broken inode forks
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2023 22:01:01 -0800
Cc: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <ZXFfeW715AvqptIq@infradead.org>
References: <170191666087.1182270.4104947285831369542.stgit@frogsfrogsfrogs> <170191666188.1182270.114932269965181078.stgit@frogsfrogsfrogs> <ZXFfeW715AvqptIq@infradead.org>

On Wed, Dec 06, 2023 at 10:00:25PM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Looks good, although as mentioned on the next patch having the health
> flag first would seem better.

And I guess this means:

Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>

References:
- [PATCHSET v28.1 0/9] xfs: online repair of inodes and forks
  - From: Darrick J. Wong
- [PATCH 5/9] xfs: zap broken inode forks
  - From: Darrick J. Wong
- Re: [PATCH 5/9] xfs: zap broken inode forks
  - From: Christoph Hellwig

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 5/9] xfs: zap broken inode forks
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 7/9] xfs: abort directory parent scrub scans if we encounter a zapped directory
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 5/9] xfs: zap broken inode forks
Next by thread: [PATCH 6/9] xfs: set inode sick state flags when we zap either ondisk fork
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [XFS Filesystem Development (older mail)] [Linux Filesystem Development] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite Trails] [Linux Kernel] [Linux RAID] [Linux SCSI]

Powered by Linux