Re: [PATCH 5/9] xfs: zap broken inode forks

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/9] xfs: zap broken inode forks
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2023 22:00:25 -0800
Cc: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <170191666188.1182270.114932269965181078.stgit@frogsfrogsfrogs>
References: <170191666087.1182270.4104947285831369542.stgit@frogsfrogsfrogs> <170191666188.1182270.114932269965181078.stgit@frogsfrogsfrogs>

Looks good, although as mentioned on the next patch having the health
flag first would seem better.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 5/9] xfs: zap broken inode forks
  - From: Christoph Hellwig

References:
- [PATCHSET v28.1 0/9] xfs: online repair of inodes and forks
  - From: Darrick J. Wong
- [PATCH 5/9] xfs: zap broken inode forks
  - From: Darrick J. Wong

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 6/9] xfs: set inode sick state flags when we zap either ondisk fork
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 5/9] xfs: zap broken inode forks
Previous by thread: [PATCH 5/9] xfs: zap broken inode forks
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 5/9] xfs: zap broken inode forks
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [XFS Filesystem Development (older mail)] [Linux Filesystem Development] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite Trails] [Linux Kernel] [Linux RAID] [Linux SCSI]

Powered by Linux